Thinking about SOA defintions

Today I was going through some posts in past I have written about SOA and some posts in other blogs like John Evdemon. In one of his posts I came across his definition of SOA. His definition is:

SOA is a loosely-coupled architecture designed to meet the business needs of the organization using services.

Last bit of using services I added as one of the commenter’s said it make the definition complete. His definition is not far off, what me and a couple of architects with different backgrounds/technologies (IBM, Oracle, SAP, Microsoft) came up. Our definition, freely translated came to this:

A Service Oriented Architecture is a structural style to establish information needs of a organization based on services.

Some nuances are in place here. Both definitions more or less say it is an style ; loosely-coupled (which is a characteristic) versus structural style (architectural style would be better). There is difference here in business needs versus information needs, which is not quite the same. Business need can be having insight in how business is running in total or being flexible (agile) in running business processes. Information need can also be insight in how business is run in total and having services to provide this.

Other thing I came across too was this quote: “SOA is an enterprise architecture style, not an application architecture style.” by Anne Thomas Manes from Burton group. SOA is an architecture style, definitions above are right. I myself self also believe/feel it is a architecture style, where services play an important role, hence they are the building blocks to create a SOA. To this style of architecture or any other principles apply. Through design (principle) characteristics of a SOA are seen during its realization.

There is a lot that has been written about principles and characteristics of SOA. So I am not going to mention them here. At Inter Access where I work we have come a long way in figuring out what SOA is, what its principles are and creating a framework. Another colleague Mike van Alst has started blogging too last September 2007. He is an Oracle ACE , works with me in Inter Access architect board around SOA. Check his blog too.

Technorati:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DTAP Strategy: Pricing and Licensing

Image
To implement BizTalk solutions it is a good practice to have an DTAP environment in place. DTAP stands for Development, Test, Acceptance and Production. Development and test environments are equal (mirrored) and same account for acceptance and production. Deploying DTAP environments is easy, because there are many factors influencing outcome of DTAP. One factor is pricing and licensing costs. BizTalk is available in different editions and since BizTalk depends on operating system and database there are some configuration options to. Here is an overview of possible configurations for DTAP environments, hence there is a nice BizTalk Feature Dependency Matrix. Besides features, there are non-functional requirements to reckon with like fail-over, availability and scalability. On Microsoft Pricing and Licensing FAQ section of BizTalk I found this on non functional side. In a large BizTalk Server 2006 R2 deployment, two key considerations ensure redundancy in all areas of the architect...
Read more

BizTalk CAT Instrumentation Framework Controller: My First Experience

Image
In past I have used log4net or System.Diagnostics.Trace component of .NET for logging and tracing. Until a few months ago the post Best Practices for Instrumenting High Performance BizTalk Solutions got my attention. I read it, but did not start using it directly as I wasn’t doing any development. These days I sometimes am involved in development of BizTalk solutions, so moment was there. Recently BizTalk CAT Instrumentation Framework Controller was released on CodePlex . The BizTalk CAT Instrumentation Framework is a high performance tracing/logging framework for BizTalk that builds upon the Event Tracing for Windows (ETW) infrastructure. It was created by Microsoft's BizTalk Customer Advisory Team (CAT). The Controller is an easy-to-use GUI for the BizTalk CAT Instrumentation Framework. My thinking was why don’t I try this UI out in combination with Microsoft AppFabric CAT Best Practices Samples . The BizTalk Instrumentation Best Practices Samples solution provides a reus...
Read more

BizTalk Server 2010 Exam : How to prepare?

Image
In previous post I yesterday I wrote that new BizTalk 2010 exam is out. And you may figure how to prepare as in preparation material nothing is mentioned.Let’s look at what skills are measured. In a nutshell these topics are: Configuring messaging architecture (setup, manage ports, configure adapters, implement messaging solutions); Developing BizTalk Artefacts (building orchestrations, create schema’s, maps and pipelines); Debugging and Exception Handling (debug orchestrations, validate and test artefacts like schema’s, maps, pipelines); Integrating Web Services and Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) Services (WCF Adapters); Implementing Extended Capabilities (this is the BAM, BRE, RFID and EDI part); Deploying, Tracking, and Supporting a BizTalk Solution (Installation in different kinds of scenario’s, deployment of applications, bindings). You can find a lot of resources that can help in preparation through BizTalk Development Center like the BizTalk tutorials for EA...
Read more